He wasn’t a physically imposing individual, but he seemed to hold command and influence over his counterparts. In Roth’s film Ryder Strong’s character, Paul, gradually emerged as the headstrong leader of the group. The problem is that very few sport character traits that separate them from one another. Zariwny lines up a handful of attractive youngsters to torture. Now, let’s get to the bullets released in the opening paragraphs. Nothing has changed in regard to the key plot so we won’t delve too deep into that one. Forget a thorough breakdown of the plot because the truth is we all know that a group of 20-somethings is headed for an isolated cabin where they consume contaminated water, only to be immediately affected by a flesh-eating bacteria that ensures certain death. Well, it’s time to break things down and tackle each of those issues. Hell, maybe one of these young thespians could turn in an Oscar-worthy (not likely, obviously) performance. A stronger script perhaps, or pitch-perfect performances maybe. Roth’s film was horrendously disgusting – could Zariwny’s picture live up to, or even exceed, expectations of the graphic disgustingness delivered by Roth? And finally, I had to know if Roth’s film could be improved upon in any way whatsoever. Third, I wanted to directly compare the gore of each picture. Who is the hero, who is comedian, and who is the unfortunate sensible individual who understands that when you step into a pit of shit, it’s tough to climb your way out of it? Second, I wanted to identify parallels between these new characters and the characters that Roth created. First, I wanted to really get a feel for the characters and appropriately identify them. Heading into Travis Zariwny’s remake of Eli Roth’s breakout gorefest, Cabin Fever, there were a few key elements targeted for supreme study.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |